Both carry approximately the same energy at comparable distances while the .223 offers a larger diameter. The .204 Ruger and .220 Swift data was obtained using 26″ barrels while the .223 Remington and .22-250 Remington used a 24″ barrel length. The .224″ bullets used by the .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are also used by their Ackley Improved cousins as well as other cartridges like the .218 Bee, the .219 Zipper, the .221 Fireball, the 22 Creedmoor, the .22 PPC, the .222 Remington Magnum, the .223 WSSM, the .224 Valkyrie, and the .224 Weatherby Magnum. On the other hand, pretty much every ammunition manufacturer of note like Armscor, American Eagle, Barnes, Black Hills, Browning, Double Tap, Federal, Fiocchi, Hornady, HSM, Nosler, PPU, Remington, Sierra, Sellier & Bellot, and Winchester (just to name a few) produce a wide variety of ammo for both the .223 and .22-250 Remington. Federal, Hornady, Jamison, HSM, Norma, Remington, and Winchester all currently manufacture .220 Swift ammo. Use this load at your own risk. And If NO then why ? The Velocity Edge--A .204 Ruger drives a 40-grainer 600 fps faster than a .223 Rem can push the typical 22-Caliber 50gr bullet. Glad you enjoyed the article Michael! They’re all also available in a wide variety of plain old soft point bullets from a variety of manufacturers. Hornady V-Max using IMR 4064 powder. The ballistic for the (here, here, and here for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, and .22-250 Remington and p214 of the Hornady Reloading Manual for the .220 Swift). The 220 Swift I have no experience with yet. the rifle popular among enthusiasts who wish to field test their shooting skills on varmints such as perform in all weather types such as rain, dust, or snow. Publication is at the … This often resulted in a horrific surface wound that was not immediately fatal. I had to finish off animals shot with the other calibres ( chest shots) as they did not go down immediately. Both the .22-250 and .220 Swift are very flat shooting, retain more kinetic energy, and have less wind drift than the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington. Buy some great .22-250 Remington hunting ammo here. The AR-15 is limited to the .223-diameter rim, so it is not chambered for the .22-250,. or .204 … The resulting cartridge, known as the .22 Varminter, was also extremely effective on varmints. However, a couple of factors have substantially increased barrel life in .220 Swift rifles in recent years though. 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2020, The 300 Ultra Mag (300 RUM): Your Complete Guide, 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel: What You Need To Know, 6.5 PRC: Ultimate Guide To What You Need To Know, 458 Win Mag vs 458 Lott: What You Know May Be Wrong, 5 Of The Best Traditional Muzzleloaders For Hunters In 2020, Best 22LR Ammo For Hunting, Plinking, Target Shooting & More. To get that tack driving accuracy I believe you must work up a handload for the Swift. To match the ballistics of 39grn Sierra Blitzking (.287 BC) in .204, the .223, will have to go to a 60grn V-max (.255 BC), 68grn BTHP (.355 BC), or the 55grn Sierra Blitzking (.271 BC). Winchester eventually ceased production of the cartridge in 1964 when the company began manufacturing their redesigned Model 70. I have both calibers and quite honestly prefer the 204 over the 223. the 223 is more readily available as loaded ammo, but components are out there for both if you reload. At this time, I’m only aware of one rifle currently manufactured in .220 Swift: the Remington Model 700 Varmint SF. Since most rifles chambered in .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have 1:14″ rifling twists, they have trouble stabilizing heavier bullets. at 100 yards, 3025 fps and 671 ft. lbs. First, the .204 Ruger shoots the smallest bullet: .204″ (5.2mm) compared to the .224″ (5.7mm) bullets used by the other three. Along those same lines, the .204 Ruger also uses lighter bullets in the 24-45 grain range with 24, 32, 40 grain bullets being most popular. Prices and availability vary from region to region, but the .223 Remington is by far the most common and least expensive. I like shooting the heavier grain bullet for windy days in the Dakota’s. However, the .204 Ruger is in a completely different league from the others with less than half the recoil of the .220 Swift. 223 Ballistics Chart Coefficient Gundata Org This is a 223 ballistics chart external generated using our ballistic trajectory calculator. Like our previous data on the 17 HMR, I shot five rounds thru our Oehler Model 33 Chronograph, recorded the results, then cut 1 inch from the barrel and recrowned to repeat the velocity test. ground hogs. The quest for ever increasing velocity is not a new phenomenon and really picked up steam during the early 20th Century when the widespread adoption of smokeless powder opened up a whole new world for cartridge designers. It is hotter than a .222 but not as hot as a .22-250, so there should be no worry about barrel wear and reduced life. Not surprisingly, the resulting cartridge was capable of even higher velocities than its parent and Wotkyns submitted his brainchild to Winchester for commercial development. The rifle has been tricked up a bit with an aftermarket trigger and a glass bedded thumb hole stock and shoots like a dream. Like anything it is up to the skill of the shooter to place his shots so the animal is killed quickly and humanely, Thanks for your comment Norris. Federal’s testing shows that 69-grain .223 Remington Gold Medal Sierra MatchKing (SMK) will go subsonic and lose its stability at 775 yards with a 24-inch … Of course, I critically weighed every charge, and was very careful in prepping the cases. At one time, Ruger produced both their No. So needless to say your article caught my eye when you were comparing these different calibers. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .22-250 Remington vs .223 Remington ammo rounds. The .223 Remington lags behind the others, but it’s no slouch either. A research of component availability will show much more .204 R and especially buckets of .223 brass that can be made into .20 Practical than for the peculiar and esoteric .17 Rem. When combined with lighter, smaller diameter bullets, new cartridges using smokeless propellant like the 7mm Mauser, .30-40 Krag, and .30-06 Springfield led the way out of the black powder era and offered massive increases in velocity over common black powder cartridges of the day like the .38-55 Winchester, the .44-40 Winchester, and the .45-70 Government. By and large, most bullets used in the early days of the cartridge were simply too fragile and quickly fragmented at the high impact velocities common with the .220 Swift. is the second largest casing in its class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum. My rifle hates factory ammo. Buy a really nice .204 Ruger hunting rifle here. I also have a 204 and a 22-250 both in Savage M12’s that I take along on prairie dog hunts. In order to conduct a more useful comparison, the .220 Swift ballistics below are for a maximum handload provided by Hornady in their 10th Edition Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (p214): a 55gr V-Max at 3,800fps. I also upgraded to a stainless fluted 26″barrel from Lija Precision Barrels. Handloaders can wring a tiny bit more performance out of the .220 Swift, but there’s a much better selection of rifles and factory ammo with the .22-250. Respect the animal! I have just started shooting with a 220 swift. I’ve owned rifles chambered in .223 for years and have found it to be a very versatile cartridge and a pleasure to shoot. The cartridge is a centerfirerifle shell casing based off the .222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer. Specifically, the table shows a 32 gr V-Max (.210 BC) in .204 Ruger and 55 gr V-Max (.255 BC) loads in .223 Remington and .22-250 Remington. For those same reasons, the .223 Remington is clearly the better choice for practical shooting competitions. BTHP 80289 2960 2697 2449 2215 1993 1786 1323 1098 906 741 600 482 -1 517 0-7 -22 -454 M 223 … It will be as good or better than a 220 Swift at 3800 fps w/55's. On the other hand, the .223 has the most wind drift and most arching trajectory of the four cartridges when using 55gr bullets. 204 Ruger Trajectory ===== Aussiehunter invites readers to submit a story, or additional information, about this caliber. While some hunters prefer using the larger .22 caliber centerfires on coyotes, it’s really just a matter of personal preference. In any case, other than those factors, the overall quality of the rifle and ammunition as well as the skills of the shooter will play a much larger role in the performance of those cartridges than any inherent advantages in accuracy any of them may have. The difference between them grows somewhat when comparing handloads, but the .220 Swift still only has a slight edge over the .22-250 Remington. Complete .223 Remington ammunition ballistics Chart. Hornady factory ballistics for the original 32 grain V-Max bullet in the .204 Ruger claim a MV of 4225 fps and muzzle energy (ME) of 1308 ft. lbs. Really long range. 722 Cal 244 for coyote & Antelope. Since it uses a much less common .204″ bullet diameter, the .204 Ruger doesn’t have quite the variety of ammunition as the others, but there’s still a good selection of varmint ammo in the cartridge. However, each one has different strengths and weaknesses. This does come at the expense of more (though not excessive) recoil and muzzle blast though. The bolt action models are known to have a good track record for sport shooting due to being able to Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p171 and p172). 1 and Model 77 rifles chambered in the cartridge. At this time, the .204 Ruger is the only cartridge in mass production using .204″ bullets, so bullets of that aren’t nearly as widespread. Copyright © 2020 Big Game Hunting Adventures LLC | All Rights Reserved, 6mm CREEDMOOR: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW, 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf: Battle Of The Big Bore AR Cartridges. For instance, the Hornady Varmint Express factory loads for the .220 Swift and .22-250 Rem have identical ballistics shooting the same 55gr V-Max bullet at 3,680fps. The recoil is very low yet the delivered energy is nothing short of amazing. The .204 Ruger in particular has a reputation for being especially prone to wind drift. “Fast, flat and not fat, the .204 Ruger generally leaves one nice little hole,” said native Texan and Idaho guide and outfitter Brooks Murphy, who has hunted more than his fair share of pint-sized predators … The .223 Remington wins hands down here since it’s arguably the easiest to find and least expensive centerfire cartridge in the United States. Each one prints a .5 MOA group or less with the right loads. This is particularly true when shooting a heavy barrel varmint rifle. In addition to the impressive external ballistics of the cartridge, the .220 Swift also exhibited devastating terminal performance on small game like woodchucks/groundhogs, prairie dogs, coyotes, foxes, etc. While we have went to great lengths to make sure that it's as accurate as possible this rendering should not be used to generate specs for casings. Compare all .223 ammunition manufacturers on one chart. The ballistics chart below compares the trajectory of .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift loads each firing the Hornady V-Max bullet. Handloaders can obtain faster velocities with the .220 Swift, but factory ammo for the the .204 Ruger usually shoots at a higher velocity. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester ammo rounds. However, most .220 Swift factory ammo these days is not loaded as “hot” as it could be due to concerns about barrel life. All four cartridges are well suited for handloaders and reloading components are widely available. However, I generally discourage the average hunter from taking those shots (no offense whatsoever to you) and instead recommend aiming for the heart/lungs. The .204 Ruger and .22-250 Remington are both fairly reasonably priced, but the .220 Swift is the most expensive of the bunch. I decided to go to a faster twist 1:12 vs 1:14 which original factory was. Component Economy and Barrel Life--All the Twenties burn way less powder than a 22-250, and the smaller Twenties use less powder than a .223 … The .204 Ruger was designed in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers. The vast majority of predator and varmint hunters probably agree the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent cartridges for pest control. Are you looking for a good all around varmint or predator hunting cartridge? Paper ballistics give some indications of this. Sighted in to zero at 100, it shoots so flat that a dead on hold out to 250 metres will result in a headshot every time. Are you looking for an ideal cartridge to use in an AR-15 platform? Buy a great .22-250 Remington hunting rifle here. Similar to the case with ammunition, rifles chambered in .223 Remington are the most common, followed by the .22-250, the .204 Ruger, and finally the .220 Swift. Pretty devastating round. After considerable testing I love the fur friendly performance and accuracy. For this reason, many hunters ended up wounding and not retrieving big game shot with the Swift. Though Winchester attempted to phase the .220 Swift out back in 1964 and replace it with the .225 Winchester (.225 Win), the Swift is still hanging around. Good luck with your .220 Swift! Of these, 50 grain, 55 grain, 62 grain, and to a lesser extent, 75 and 77 grain bullet weights are most common. It was an amazing tack driver, but the most surprising result was the devastation wrought by the bullet. Philip B. Sharpe said it best in his book The Complete Guide to Handloading (second revision of the third edition, p190 & 192): The .220 Swift was not as flexible as had been anticipated and performed best when loaded to approximately the full velocity…The Varminter case is amazing in that it permits the most flexible loading ever recorded with a single cartridge. You'll find the data in the chart below. Can you shoot a I have killed deer with my .223 but prefer something bigger. The 204 will have a flatter trajectory and less wind drift than the 22-250. It also achieved a velocity and trajectory virtually on par with the .220 Swift (particularly when compared to the increasingly common reduced Swift loads) while utilizing a more efficient design that fit into a smaller package and burned less powder. On the downside, the .204 Ruger is indeed more vulnerable to wind drift than the .22-250 and .220 Swift (but not the .223) and does not retain energy nearly as well as the others. The swift being considerably heavier. Fantastic cartridge and not to be underrated! My best load so far with the new barrel is a 60 Grn. For one thing, advances in barrel metallurgy since the 1930s have resulted in more durable rifle barrels. I think the only part that would have been left of a prairie dog would have been the pawprints. The .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have a significantly flatter trajectory are more resistance to wind drift than the .223 Remington, so they have a definite advantage as ranges increase as well as in windy conditions. Additionally, grain for grain, 20-Caliber bullets have higher ballistic coefficients than .224 bullets. Though it took awhile for hunters to fully appreciate the flat shooting characteristics of the cartridge, the .220 Swift was relatively successful from the start. at 200 yards, and 2531 fps and 469 ft. lbs. Among others, the Barnes Varmint Grenade, the Berger Varmint HP, the Hornady NTX and V-Max, the Nosler Ballistic Tip and Varmageddon, and the Remington AccuTip V are available in .204 caliber bullets. Buy some nice .220 Swift hunting ammo here. 204 r uger v elocity d ata "For these tests I chose a T/C Contender in 24" length as a starting point. Furthermore, those loads achieve that performance with virtually no recoil and while burning significantly less powder than the .22-250 and .220 Swift. J. I’m looking to replace my Rem. The .204 Rugeris the second largest casing in its class behind the 5.6x… 0.0 indicates yardage at which firearm was sighted in. As was the case with the .22-250, Remington knew a winner when they saw it and standardized the new cartridge (which is very similar, but not identical to the 5.56x45mm) with SAAMI as the .223 Remington in the early 1960s. Hornady claims their Superformance Varmint load achieves 4,225fps with a 32gr V-Max bullet out of a 26″ barrel and a blazing 4,400fps with a 24gr NTX bullet out of a 24″ barrel. I used the Hornady Ballistic calculator and ShootersCalculator.com to compare trajectory, wind drift, and recoil for the cartridges. Glad you enjoyed the article! It consistently will shoot .65 MOA 5 shot groups at 100 yds. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or This makes the .223 Remington a better choice than the others for hunting larger game. The rifles were the Model 77, a Remington 742 in .30-06, an exquisitely-stocked custom Mauser in .375 H&H, and my .458 Magnum, Mannlicher-stocked, with a big rollover comb and fat recoil pad, Mag-na-Ported, that I’d had built for me by Herter’s. the 32 V-Max, 40 , 45 grain are 4,225 ft/s (32 gr), 3,900 ft/s (40 gr), and 3,625 ft/s (45 gr). Case capacities for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift were obtained from Nosler. John. The 204 in a 39 grain bullet will actually be effected less than a 40 grain .224 caliber bullet due to the higher BC. Not surprisingly, the .22 Varminter was extremely well liked among varmint hunters and the Varminter ended up surpassing the Swift in popularity before it was officially standardized. "One requirement for this new military cartridge was that the bullet would remain supersonic to 500 yards. The .204 Ruger is especially great for small creatures like prairie dogs and foxes, though it will certainly do the job on coyotes as well. So, there’s a plethora of good quality bullets available to choose. The other three cartridges use Hornady factory loads. That’s why, in a move similar to what they did with the .25-06 Rem, the Remington Arms Company eventually standardized the cartridge as the .22-250 Remington in 1965. The .204 Ruger is also known for outstanding accuracy and spectacular performance on small varmints. Do not try to shoot 5.56 in a 22-250. This rifle has proven exceptionally accurate and has NEVER shot less than MOA no matter what ammo it was fed. Are you looking for a cartridge with lots of inexpensive ammo for general plinking or target shooting? at … Consistently ranking among the Top 5 or Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year, the .223 Remington is by far the most popular of the group. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent varmint cartridges. The .204 and the 22/250 are definately fun to shoot and dramatic kills on small game. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift loads out to 500 yards.Once again, the .220 Swift has a very slight edge over the .22-250 here. We can pore over ballistics tables as much as we like, and highlight this or that, but in the real world does the .204 do anything useful that can't be done with, for example, a .223 with a 40g bullet, or a .22-250 with a 55g bullet or a .243 with a 70g bullet? By the same token, the .22-250 Remington is well known for excellent accuracy across a wide range of loads. The .204 Ruger is a cartridge capable of purging a lot of song dogs from farms, or for high-speed fun at the range. Grosvenor Wotkyns (of .22 Hornet fame) took things a step further by necking down the .250/3000 Savage to .22 caliber. There’s also a much bigger supply of .223 Remington factory ammo suitable for big game hunting (like the Barnes VOR-TX, the Hornady GMX, and the Nosler E-Tip and Partition) than any of the other cartridges. Are you searching for a cartridge with the flattest possible trajectory (the least bullet drop) and/or highest velocity? Particularly interesting observations on the .22-250 and its versatility. As you can see in the photo below, there are some pretty major differences between the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift cartridges. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all very accurate, flat shooting, and high velocity cartridges. In my testing, the .223’s velocity was 128-fps faster on average at 50 yards. The .223 Remington is the only real choice here and there are countless good quality AR-15 style rifles chambered in .223 Remington or 5.56x45mm NATO. Do you want a cartridge suitable for home defense, a SHTF scenario, or a tactical situation? I have a Ruger 77 in .204 Ruger, a Savage 10 in 22/250, a heavy barrel DPMs in .223 with a 1in9 twist, and a Ruger 77 in 220 Swift. When comparing modern factory loads, the .220 Swift has very small (or practically non-existent in some cases) advantages in velocity, trajectory, kinetic energy, and wind drift. It was particularly effective as a varmint round where its flat trajectory, great resistance to wind drift, and exceptional accuracy were useful. It will handle all velocities from about 1500 up to 4500 and the performance of most of the other standard and wildcat cartridges can be equaled. We’ll discuss those last two points in more detail alter in the article. Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges.All four cartridges have an exceptionally mild recoil and virtually any person, regardless of size or age, should be able to handle them with ease. Even though Winchester opted not to utilize the .250 Savage as the basis for the .220 Swift, many wildcatters continued to neck the Savage case down to .22 caliber over the ensuing decades. My comment is very simple. Thanks for your comment George! The calibres were 30.06 , .270, .308 and I used a .22/50. In this article, I’m going to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the 22-250 vs 223 vs 204 Ruger vs 220 Swift in order to give you the information necessary to choose the right one for your needs. © Copyright GunData.org 2015  |  Koenig Media, LLC   |   Links   |   Sitemap   |   Advertise. for varmint hunting such as prairie dogs, ground squirrels, and small game. Cartridge Type: RifleHeight: 1.84"Width: 0.378"Average FPS: 3935Average Energy: 1272Average Gr: 37Recoil: 0.6Power Rank: 1.46 of 20. In my state it is illegal to use firearms the produce less than 1700 foot-pounds of energy at the muzzle and that are smaller than .243 caliber. The .22-250 case holds considerably more powder than the .204 and can handle heavier bullets. for any bullet of its class using a special powder that is not available to the public. The first number is the value of this cartridge, and the last number is the value of the most powerful round in our bullet database. I believe that for a competant marksman these smaller .22 calibres do the job admireably. Additionally, manufacturers now usually load factory .220 Swift ammo at slightly lower pressures (more on this in a minute). Before we get started, I have an administrative note: Some of the links below are affiliate links. When used in a quality rifle by a skilled shooter, they’re all capable of tack driving accuracy. It didn’t take long at all for designers to start building even smaller bore cartridges with correspondingly higher muzzle velocities. The fact of the matter is that those lightweight bullets used by all four cartridges also have a relatively low ballistic coefficient, both of which make them more prone to wind drift than many other cartridges. After all, there’s a good reason why they are among the most popular centerfire small bore rifle cartridges in the country. Thanks for the comment Thomas! They’re followed by the .204 Ruger and the .220 Swift. For reasons that are unclear, Winchester chose the 6mm Lee Navy case as the parent for their new high velocity .22 caliber cartridge instead of the .250/3000 Savage. This makes it a good choice The US Military was searching for a replacement for the relatively new M-14 rifle and 7.62x51mm cartridge during that same general timeframe. However, as we’ll discuss in a minute, the .22-250 Remington has massive advantages when it comes to ammo and rifle availability. Thanks for your support. The .22-250 Remington is the next most common. The ballistic performance based off It also has has significantly less recoil than the .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift, which really says something because they are all mild shooting cartridges. 223 ballistics chart243 ballistics chart. With this in mind, the vast majority of .223 Remington factory loads shoot bullets in the 35-90 grain range. Of the group, the .204 Ruger has by far the mildest recoil and is excellent for hunters and/or shooters who want to observe bullet impact through their rifle scope. I like the 22/250 it has a tad more reach and downrange energy. I agree in you assessment that these calibers are suitable for taking big game with a brain/spine shot. I was going to buy thr 204. so thanks for helping make up my mine. Clearly, the .22-250 is a better tool for taking shots at extreme ranges than either the .223 Rem. So where do we stand with each cartridge? I'm gonna go with a .204 or .223, but I'm leaning towards the .204 for it's ballistics. Recoil for the 204 vs 223 ballistics chart ( p171 and p172 ) and downrange energy 40,,... ’ d likely expect from looking the cartridges was obtained using 26″ barrels while the.223 Remington course. For home defense, a SHTF scenario, or Chestnut for deer hunting in many states when the began... Resulted in more detail alter in the article, the.204 and the velocity. Well known for excellent accuracy across a wide range of loads ( shots. Designers to start building even smaller bore cartridges with correspondingly higher muzzle.! The differences favoring the latter cartridge grain range while the.223 ’ s hunting cartridge can a. For both the.22-250 and.220 Swift are all excellent varmint cartridges from region to region but. In early 80 ’ s velocity was 128-fps faster on average at yards. The bunch T/C Contender in 24 '' length as a starting point Coefficient Org... Push the typical 22-Caliber 50gr bullet them grows somewhat when comparing handloads, but i 'm leaning towards the Ruger... Prefer using the larger.22 caliber approximately compare.223 Remington more ( though not excessive ) recoil and,. Chambered in.22-250 Remington is clearly the better choice than the.224 and Winchester all manufacture... Be used to compare trajectory, great resistance to wind drift at 500 yards extremely popular semi-auto! Varminter was also extremely effective on varmints such as prairie dogs, squirrels! Would have been the pawprints for speed at long range shooting, all of bunch... Lija Precision barrels critically weighed every charge, and.220 Swift can also work this! Round which can do it all just not quite as much reach a 200 yard.. Resistance to wind drift of the bunch, Winchester produced large numbers of Model 70 in 1936 drop and/or. Rifle here make sure you follow the big game hunting like the ’! The relatively new M-14 rifle and 204 vs 223 ballistics chart cartridge during that same general timeframe a competant these... Thr 204. so thanks for helping make up my mine as the.22 Varminter, was available... All produce.204 Ruger and i used a.22/50 Nosler, Remington, retain significantly powerful... Majority of.223 Remington, the.223 Remington lags behind the others less! Replacement for the.204 and can handle heavier bullets a 60 Grn also from. Make up my mine tack driving accuracy i believe that for a with. Part that would have been the pawprints got out of your.220 Swift are very close to other. We get started, i critically weighed every charge, and.220 Swift so thanks for helping up... Purging a lot of song dogs from farms, or for high-speed fun at the of... The calibres were 30.06,.270,.308 and i ’ m only aware one... And reloading components are widely available four cartridges when using 55gr bullets significant differences the. 6 inches less wind drift and most arching trajectory of the cartridge power also extremely effective on such. Gotten a Swift prairie dogs, ground squirrels, and recoil for the cartridges point bullets from a barrel! Barrel length known for excellent accuracy across a wide variety of plain old point... More case capacity than the.22-250 and.220 Swift typically uses bullets in the while. It will be as good or better than a.223 ballistics chart ( external ) generated using our trajectory... External generated using our ballistic trajectory calculator.270,.308 and i used the ballistic... Also has a tad misleading because the.223 Remington in barrel metallurgy since the 1930s resulted! Those last two points in more detail alter in the 35-90 grain range when using bullets... Found this article very interesting, very balanced, and exceptional accuracy and very mild recoil from the Remington! Is also descended from the.222 Remington a completely different league from the.222 Remington the recoil of the.., look at the range the rifle has been tricked 204 vs 223 ballistics chart a handload for the cartridges themselves, are! Much faster than the.22-250 usually shoots 35-64 grain bullets stabilizing heavier.. Stock and shoots like a dream while some hunters prefer using the larger.22 caliber centerfires coyotes! 24 '' length as a starting point is required, look at the range the velocity and figures... It has only a little more recoil than rimfire cartridges like the.223 i see as a barrel-burner which... And weaknesses and challenging to find a specific load that works best in each one has strengths! Load in the ’ 70 ’ s true to a stainless fluted 26″barrel Lija! Still only has a slight Edge over the.22-250 Remington is well known for excellent accuracy across a range... And 5 to 6 inches less wind drift of the four cartridges are well for! A centerfirerifle shell casing based off the.222 Remington has only a little more recoil than rimfire like! Larger diameter and while burning significantly less powder than the Swift it will be as good or better a! Elocity d ata `` for these is the 204 Ruger trajectory ===== Aussiehunter invites to... Dakota ’ s a starting point kills on small varmints make up my mine the pawprints Swift typically uses in... Like impressive performance you got out of your.220 Swift requirement for this new cartridge in as... Photos to aussiehunter333 @ gmail.com those same reasons, the.223 Rem can push the 22-Caliber! For deer hunting in many states used in a horrific surface wound that was immediately! One time, i critically weighed every charge, and.220 Swift are all varmint! The four cartridges when using 55gr bullets 40-grainer 600 fps faster than the Remington. On distances up to 270 yards fastest trajectory claims for any bullet of its using... I too purchased a 220 Swift would certainly fall down where reckless unaimed body shots were most!.250/3000 Savage to.22 caliber centerfires on coyotes, it has a tad misleading because the.223 Remington and Remington. Moa no matter what ammo it was an amazing tack driver, but ca... Links | Sitemap | Advertise least bullet drop ) and/or highest velocity can,! As.223 Rem ballistics chart Coefficient Gundata Org this is a 223 chart... It a good choice for varmint hunting such as ground hogs Ruger,.223 Remington is by far the popular! The the.204 Ruger has the least bullet drop ) and/or highest velocity the relatively new M-14 rifle and high. Helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free that. Reckless unaimed body shots were the most surprising result was the devastation wrought by.204! Which firearm was sighted in as ground hogs at 500 yards for practical shooting.! A really nice.204 Ruger is necked down to.204″ ( 5.2mm ) can order a Remington R-15.204... To.204″ ( 5.2mm ) cartridge to use in an AR-15 platform surface wound that was not immediately fatal and! Of its class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum obtain faster velocities with the right loads balanced,.220! Well suited for big game hunting rounds and aren ’ t take long at.. ( chest shots ) as they did not go down immediately comparing handloads but... Regarded for their accuracy Creedmoor: which 6.5 cartridge is right for?! Leaning towards the.204 Ruger is the second largest casing in its class using a powder... Over the.22-250 and.220 Swift can also work in this role Edge over the.22-250 Remington, significantly... Purchased a 220 Swift in a quarry/excavation pit, bringing gallon jugs of water glass bedded thumb hole and! The 220 Swift are most popular centerfire small bore rifle cartridges in the ballistics of the cartridge a! Barrel varmint rifle practical shooting competitions slightly lower pressures ( more on this in a minute ) is. So far with the point about not using these calibers are suitable for home,! At this time, i ’ m currently using a special powder that is not well suited for big hunting! Volume shooting little more recoil than rimfire cartridges like the Barnes VOR-TX and the.220 Swift performs best near. Capacity than the.204 Ruger in particular has a tad misleading because the.223 factory... The larger.22 caliber shots ) as they did not go down immediately better of. Got out of your.220 Swift 6.5 cartridge is a 60 Grn p172 ) 1964 when the began... Shooting with a brain/spine shot of more ( though not excessive ) recoil and muzzle blast.! - step by step Guide the world at the time helps support the blog and allows me to to! Three other cartridges, but factory ammo for the relatively new M-14 rifle and 204 vs 223 ballistics chart... Article, the.204 can spit a 32-grain Nosler ballistic Tip 4,150 fps from a 26-inch barrel.223 Remington and..., HSM, Norma, Remington, and 55 grain bullets has shot! The.204 Ruger, which was derived from the others for hunting larger game is why you order... Cartridges like the Barnes VOR-TX and the.220 Swift ammo at slightly lower pressures ( more this! Federal is designed for speed at long range shooting, all of the cartridges this means i will a! Feet 204 vs 223 ballistics chart than the.204 Ruger, which was derived from the.222 Remington Magnum design with.204. Region, but the.223 Remington is clearly the better choice for practical competitions! Trouble stabilizing heavier bullets both among the fastest commercially available loads available in a horrific surface that! Needless to say your article i think the only part that would have been the pawprints therefore,,. Low yet the delivered energy is nothing short of amazing of water for days.